Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to make
GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think MallocDebug) tools and
other things might be nice in this regard.
Also, a fully working ProjectCenter would be good
Hello,
On Saturday, October 22, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and
it has
become a cause for concern for me.
for me too, it has become sometimes a cause of frustration. Since I have
put it as only graphical
Hey,
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Adam Fedor wrote:
Plus we can't say, 'just update from CVS' to everyone who has a problem
anymore. Most people won't have svn, even if they knew how to do that
stuff. We need to update things like the daily snapshots.
I wonder if we could still
Andriy Gapon schrieb:
In my opinion what NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains() does now is
incorrect. I don't have an opportunity to verify how this function
behaves in original NeXTStep or how it behaves in OS X framework, but I
think GNUstep behavior is unreasonable.
I see two possible
David Ayers schrieb:
Andriy Gapon schrieb:
In my opinion what NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains() does now is
incorrect. I don't have an opportunity to verify how this function
behaves in original NeXTStep or how it behaves in OS X framework, but I
think GNUstep behavior is unreasonable.
I
Citát Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to make
GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think MallocDebug) tools and
other things might be nice in this regard.
Hello,
I will put my thoughts down very bluntly thus try to get the meaning and
don't stop too much on the form.
My question is essentially... why do we need a change in gnustep? The
pope recently said continuous change is evil. ANd I agree, it is one
of the things that in computing is
On Oct 24, 2005, at 5:08 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to
make
GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think MallocDebug)
tools and
other things might be nice in this
snip, very good analyiss
Suggested next steps:
snip
- define project roles (and use person redundancy)
and last, but not least:
- observe and copy behaviour of successful players (*)
Stefan
I like to comment on your final next steps on mainly on Cbjective-C
language.
IMO, from a
Quoting Adrian Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 24, 2005, at 5:08 AM, Sa#65533;o Kiselkov wrote:
Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to
make
GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think
Riccardo,
--- Riccardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Saturday, October 22, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and
it has
become a cause for concern for me.
for me too, it has become sometimes a
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Let me shoot the question first - what is the rationale behind
NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains not returning directory name if the
directory does not exist ? Esp. so if NSUserDomainMask is used ?
This is the way the function was defined to work a long time ago. In other
Riccardo,
--- Riccardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I will put my thoughts down very bluntly thus try to get the meaning and
don't stop too much on the form.
My question is essentially... why do we need a change in gnustep?
We need change in GNUstep to make it more palatable to a
13 matches
Mail list logo
