On Feb 19, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 19 Feb 2006, at 05:27, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Hello all,
Objective-C is an incredible programming language, but right now the
most crippling factor for its widespread use is the lack of a
standard
library. Right now there are
I think it's a great idea!
On Feb 19, 2006, at 12:27 AM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Hello all,
Objective-C is an incredible programming language, but right now the
most crippling factor for its widespread use is the lack of a
standard
library. Right now there are two prevalent options to
On 19. Feb 2006, at 10:21 Uhr, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
I don't think libFoundation is more flexible than GNUstep-base ...
rather
it's different, and I don't really see why gnustep needs to try to
'beat' it.
I agree.
For me lF is a bit more flexibile since I can change anything I
On 2/19/06, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Feb 2006, at 05:27, Andrew Ruder wrote:
[snip]
Possible setups might be ...
Linux FHS installation (really just needs implementing in gnustep-make)
I guess his point is that someone may just want to compile GNUstep-base
as
Hey all,
On Sunday, February 19, 2006, at 06:27 AM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Objective-C is an incredible programming language, but right now the
most crippling factor for its widespread use is the lack of a standard
library. Right now there are two prevalent options to utilizing Obj-C
in your
On 2006-02-19 17:12:20 +0100 Helge Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
(though I have the impression that gstep-base still contains too
much GS* stuff).
[...]
Amen to that.
--
Chris
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Hi,
On Sunday 12 February 2006 03:34, Joshua Pennington wrote:
What is the current state of syntax highlighting in Project Center? I've
looked at the code in PCEditorView+Highlighting.m. Either it doesn't
work, or the way I used it was wrong. Stoyan, is there anything I can do
to help with
