Re: Two NSFileManager questions

2006-03-10 Thread Enrico Sersale
On 2006-03-10 05:28:59 +0200 Jonathan Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006-03-09 18:42:13 -0600 Enrico Sersale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006-03-09 10:55:20 +0200 Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8 Mar 2006, at 13:32, Enrico Sersale wrote: 2) I can't find a way

Re: Two NSFileManager questions

2006-03-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 8 Mar 2006, at 13:32, Enrico Sersale wrote: 1) NSFileManager, in -_copyPath:::, when encounters a directory, tries to create a new destination directory with the same attributes of the source; if the directory is created but the attributes can't be set it skips the source contents, even

Re: GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value ('/etc/GNUstep/GNUstep.conf') is not an absolute path

2006-03-10 Thread Alex Perez
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: On 6 Mar 2006, at 15:39, Tom Koelman wrote: Hi, I am fixing the Windows Installer with regard to the GNUstep.conf file. I am building base 1.11.2 and gui 0.10.2. base 1.11.2 was unfortunately not tested on mingw, and released broken. I would therefore rather

Re: FOSS Mediation Manual -- Lowering the Bar.

2006-03-10 Thread Adam Fedor
On 2006-02-22 22:28:36 -0700 Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wrote some guidelines that should help FOSS projects getting more lively and lowering the barrier for new developers to join. You can find them in form of a small manual here http://projects.mi.fu-berlin.de/w/bin/view/SE/Th

Re: Two NSFileManager questions

2006-03-10 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 8 Mar 2006, at 13:32, Enrico Sersale wrote: 2) I can't find a way to remove broken symlinks; - removeFileAtPath:: doesn't work in this case. I can't see why this shouldn't work for you ... the code looks OK and the method works fine for me. However, when I tried using GWorkspace to delet

Re: GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value ('/etc/GNUstep/GNUstep.conf') is not an absolute path

2006-03-10 Thread Jeremy Bettis
Alex Perez wrote: Shouldn't we make it a formal policy to test under mingw before making any RELEASE? Is there a checklist everyone much follow before making a release? It should probably be on the wiki, perhaps locked/in review-submit-only mode so it can only be edited by the respective packa

Re: Proposal: Mandatory periodic releases

2006-03-10 Thread Helge Hess
Hi, On 1. Mrz 2006, at 15:15 Uhr, Gregory John Casamento wrote: One of the ways I've noticed that other projects act is that they, under normal circumstances, try to make regular releases of the code at predictable intervals. This helps to reassure people that the project is active and it

Re: SystemPreferences

2006-03-10 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-02-24 11:07:47 +0100 Dennis Leeuw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Chris, Would this also mean the we need a /System/Library/Inspectors /System/Library/Finder /System/Library/TextConverters /System/Library/GSPrinting just no name a view others that are falling in the same category. Or am

Re: Svn checkout instructions

2006-03-10 Thread Adam Fedor
On 2006-02-27 04:58:44 -0700 Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: svn co http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/ BTW: why is that? Shouldn't there be a trunk? GNUstep is made of a bunch of projects, so putting everything under trunk would make it hard to make separate releases for each projec

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal

2006-03-10 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-02-26 03:12:10 +0100 Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hear, Hear! This should be the default location. The other gnustep junk can still live in /usr/gnustep or wherever else, but the libs should be in *STANDARD FHS LOCATIONS*. Uhm ... 'scuse me, this is all good and stuff, BUT..

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal

2006-03-10 Thread Helge Hess
On 26. Feb 2006, at 15:49 Uhr, Chris Vetter wrote: Or rather the other way around, Linux is the only system 'using' the FHS. So calling the FHS a standard is a bit over the top. I think it would be more helpful to explain how your favorite system differs to FHS than bashing FHS so that the r

Re: Svn checkout instructions

2006-03-10 Thread Adam Fedor
On Mar 4, 2006, at 7:08 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: This should be prominently displayed on our website somewhere, and mentioned on the project page.   As Nicola pointed out earlier, it's all too easy for someone who is new to miss. Well, from the main page (index list), click on Download,

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal

2006-03-10 Thread Dennis Leeuw
Chris Vetter wrote: On 2006-02-26 03:12:10 +0100 Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hear, Hear! This should be the default location. The other gnustep junk can still live in /usr/gnustep or wherever else, but the libs should be in *STANDARD FHS LOCATIONS*. Uhm ... 'scuse me, this is all