On Wed, 10 May 2006 00:09:39 +0200, Helge Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 9. Mai 2006, at 23:06 Uhr, Hubert Chan wrote:
>> One problem with getting general FHS compliance that I can see is
>> that the FHS doesn't have anything analogous to the Network or user
>> domains.
> Well, Network is _r
On 9. Mai 2006, at 06:17 Uhr, Andrew Ruder wrote:
I don't believe that this should be an option; this should be
*STANDARD*
operation.
Maybe I'm wrong but people seem to consider FHS vs GNUstep hierarchy
and either/or thing. It certainly isn't. FHS (or other system
hierarchies) is just an
On 9. Mai 2006, at 23:06 Uhr, Hubert Chan wrote:
One problem with getting general FHS compliance that I can see is that
the FHS doesn't have anything analogous to the Network or user
domains.
Well, Network is _roughly_ like /opt and user domains are basically
in ~ (~/bin, ~/lib if you wish
On Mon, 8 May 2006 23:17:50 -0500, Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> P.S. I think this will also boost our adoption into distros
> incredibly, GNUstep is not exactly the easiest thing to get into a
> distro due to its non-conformity.
Currently, in Debian, the GNUstep packages "fake"
On 9 May 2006, at 14:40, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Richard,
My apologies for the top post, but the developers of the Yahoo beta
Mail application don't seem to realize that people sometimes want
to comment inside, or indeed below, a previous email. :)
NSBundle does make some assumptio
Am 09.05.2006 um 15:40 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:
Richard,
My apologies for the top post, but the developers of the Yahoo beta
Mail application don't seem to realize that people sometimes want
to comment inside, or indeed below, a previous email. :)
NSBundle does make some assumptio
Richard,My apologies for the top post, but the developers of the Yahoo beta Mail application don't seem to realize that people sometimes want to comment inside, or indeed below, a previous email. :)NSBundle does make some assumptions regarding where the resources might be. For instance, it looks i
On 9 May 2006, at 03:21, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
NSBundle Abstraction
Why should we be constrained to the .app wrapper?
One of the things which I've done on the NibCompatibility branch is
to abstract the model loading mechanism so that it has "loader"
classes. E
On 9 May 2006, at 07:45, Yen-Ju Chen wrote:
Andrew Ruder aeruder.net> writes:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:21:04PM -0700, Gregory John Casamento
wrote:
FHS Compliance
==
We could have Foundation and AppKit in the /usr/local/include
directory, the libraries in /usr/local/lib a
