Re: question to backend/gui guru...

Hi, On 12.09.2006, at 11:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some of the classes i might use : (picked up from www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/Gui/Reference/) NSColor* NSCursor NSEvent NSFileWrapper NSFont*, NSGlyph* NSImage* NSGraphicsContext NSOpenGL* NSResponder NSScreen NSSound

Re: Debug as default...

On Sep 20, 2006, at 06:19, Nicola Pero wrote: Anyway, let me know if '-g -O2' causes problems, I presume if the '- O2' seriously confuse the debugger let me know and we can revert that change, or maybe use '-g -O' ? At least the exception handling in libFoundation (which uses nested

Compiling and running a test tool

Hi, I can compile and run a test tool consisting of a single source file by invoking make test using a GNUmakefile like this include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make foo_OBJC_FILES=foo.m include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/test-tool.make test: ./obj/foo which is pretty sweet. Trouble

Re: Compiling and running a test tool

Doh! Sorry to reply to my own post. Sorry to post in the first place. It is late and my brain is slow. I've sorted it now. *mutters about TABs in makefiles* Regards, Sheldon ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Re: GNUstep Testfarm Results

On Sep 20, 2006, at 5:25 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: Success Compile i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.0 Wed Sep 20 03:56:58 CEST 2006 Fail Compile i686-pc-linux-gnu Tue Sep 19 22:23:54 CEST 2006 Success Compile powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Wed Sep 20 03:14:48 MDT 2006 Fail Compile sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Wed

RE: Compiling and running a test tool

Thanks ... a test-tool is exactly the same as a tool; the only difference is that 'make install' does nothing. :-) So it's standard stuff -- include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make TEST_TOOL_NAME = test test_OBJC_FILES = foo.m include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/test-tool.make At which point,