Not sure this got through ... so resending
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Frith-Macdonald
Date: 5 October 2006 11:28:37 BDT
To: Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gregory John Casamento
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Developer GNUstep gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Subject:
Test results for GNUstep as of Fri Oct 6 06:34:14 EDT 2006
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
Hi Richard,
A clear document, the only thing I miss is a rationale for the use of
the SONAME with a major.minor structure, instead of the more common
major. I think this would help in the understanding why, and resulting
in less discussion.
I could even imagine that you use the SONAME major
On 6 Oct 2006, at 12:04, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
, the only thing I miss is a rationale for the use of the SONAME
with a major.minor structure, instead of the more common major. I
think this would help in the understanding why, and resulting in
less discussion.
I have no real idea of what's
I like this proposal very much, there is one area, where I see problems,
but we could wait until we actually face them. This is the question, who
will be willing to work on the bugfix releases?
Most developers will spend their time and efforts on the new unstable
release, then somebody needs to
On 6 Oct 2006, at 19:16, Fred Kiefer wrote:
I like this proposal very much, there is one area, where I see
problems,
but we could wait until we actually face them. This is the
question, who
will be willing to work on the bugfix releases?
Most developers will spend their time and efforts on