Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Oct 18 06:34:16 EDT 2006
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
On 18 Oct 2006, at 01:10, Sheldon Gill wrote:
Well, you actually are relying on conventions anyway. You've
called the class _GSPrivate using the underscore convention to
indicate privacy.
Sure ... as I said, I used a variety of mechanisms ... to be as safe
as possible.
Also, these
On 18 Oct 2006, at 11:46, Matt Rice wrote:
this can also be done by using the
__attribute__ ((visibility (hidden)))
function attribute found in the gcc info page..
requires gcc 3.something and not available on all
platforms, but,put putting a define in there such as
#define GS_HIDDEN
for
I'd like us to be able to make a stable release (1.14.0) of the base
library early next year (before FOSDEM) and want to make sure that we
get any reorganisation needed to keep the base library APIs stable
for a long time done by then.
Anything we want to deprecate/remove needs to be
I think remaining reasons are rather a matter of taste ... do we
want to use ObjC semantics or C semantics generally?
Do we care whether we group functionality in a class, or use a
collection of functions with a common prefix?
Do we want to use a single style or both functions and methods?
Adam Fedor schrieb:
Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Oct 18 06:34:16 EDT 2006
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
On 18 Oct 2006, at 22:06, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Adam Fedor schrieb:
Test results for GNUstep as of Wed Oct 18 06:34:16 EDT 2006
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that
system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this
