On 1/29/07, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Perhaps we could put a set of images to represent the key masks needed.The
#/+/- scheme adds absolutely nothing and only clutters the interface. It would
be better to implement a mechanism which shows some images (pehaps
On 1/29/07, Nicolas Roard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Images would be better, indeed. You probably do not need to show the
shift modifier though -- simply use an uppercase letter (unless it's
not a letter, of course).
And of course I don't think it's really useful to put the alt modifier
as it
I'm a bit confused by your email. ;-)
I guess it simply shows that most people are not aware of the 'radical'
filesystem-independency plan that we have been working on in gnustep-make and
gnustep-base for the past few years! ;-)
Wouldn't it be possible to change make so that it handles both
Nicolas Roard schrieb:
On 1/29/07, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Perhaps we could put a set of images to represent the key masks
needed.The #/+/- scheme adds absolutely nothing and only clutters
the interface. It would be better to implement a mechanism which
Hi
On my system (Ubuntu), I need the following patch and additional file
for fswatcher-inotify.m to compile. sys/inotify.h doesn't exist and
linux/inotify.h does not define the syscalls.
local_inotify_syscalls.h comes from gamin.
Philippe
--
The optimist thinks that this is the best of all
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 22:37 -0800, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
All,
Sorry to chime in so late on this one, RL has kept me quite busy over the
last few weeks. :)
Wouldn't it be possible to change make so that it handles both setups
(i.e. FHS or GNUstep)?This way we could have one
