Matt Rice schrieb:
> On 2007-02-05 16:36:35 -0800 Matt Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2007-02-05 11:47:20 -0800 Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't followed the rest of the discussion, but this patch looks fine
>>> to me. Does it resolve all the issues that Guenther r
Test results for GNUstep as of Tue Feb 6 06:34:16 EST 2007
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_ca
wrt reloadItem:reloadChildren: redisplaying all the rows
saw this discussed
athttp://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9487
this seems to work... not sure what happens if the item isn't in the
outline view
it might want to test that...
also, not sure how much of an optimization
I had an email discussion with Nikolaus Schaller about the code in
NSByteOrder.h which does the byte swapping for GNUstep and he convinced
me that we may not handle the case of swapping doubles correctly for
certain ARM processors. Here the word order in doubles seems to differ
from the general byt
