> I just tried reinstalling everything from scratch and I don't get that error.
Actually, it turns out that I had already figured out this problem and fixed it
(by rewriting resource-set.make), but I forgot to commit the rewrite.
So of course gnustep-base localizable resources worked fine for me
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:00:18AM +0100, Nicola Pero wrote:
>
> > I just tried reinstalling everything from scratch and I don't get that
> > error.
>
> Actually, it turns out that I had already figured out this problem and fixed
> it
> (by rewriting resource-set.make), but I forgot to commit t
On 13 Mar 2007, at 10:01, Philippe Roussel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:00:18AM +0100, Nicola Pero wrote:
I just tried reinstalling everything from scratch and I don't get
that error.
Actually, it turns out that I had already figured out this problem
and fixed it
(by rewriting res
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:23:24AM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> At a guess ... the supplied string is not legal UTF-8
>
> I suggest looking to see what the content of 'bytes' actually is, and
> see where it came from.
Well, bytes value is "février" (in iso-8859-1 I think) and comes f
Hi!
To save some common work for all the people implementing HTML engines at
the moment ;-) , here's a complete (p)list of the HTML entities used in
HTML 4.0:
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/etoile/trunk/Etoile/Services/User/Grr/Resources/Data/HTML-Entities.plist?rev=1476&view=auto
It's all generated
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:58:44PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:23:24AM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> > At a guess ... the supplied string is not legal UTF-8
> >
> > I suggest looking to see what the content of 'bytes' actually is, and
> > see where it ca
Selon Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Xavier Glattard wrote:
> > Fred Kiefer gmx.de> writes:
> > (...)
> >> 3. Changes to GNUstep
> >>
> >> mySTEP has a few correction and additions to methods that are already
> >> implemented in GNUstep. We should try to extract as much of these as
> >> possi
This should go in the stable branch as well, right?
On Mar 13, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Mar 13 09:56:51 2007
New Revision: 24856
URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep?rev=24856&view=rev
Log:
Committed rewrite of resource-set.make that I had forgotten to
Sure - if someone is maintaining the 'stable' branch, of course please
backport any fixes ;-)
Thanks
PS: From the bug reports I see it's clear that after the massive amount of
changes in the past month or two, core is still stabilizing -- it may
be a month or so before we can ship a stable releas