Great! What you explained is the intention.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
- Original Message
From: Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:23:27 PM
Subject: RE: Moving GNUstep applications t
> If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for
> the
> project to proceed is to change the license of our applications (GWorkspace,
> Gorm,
> etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license. All of the libraries
> should
> remain LGPL.
You probably mean tha
All,
I recently recieved an email from the FSF regarding moving to the new GPLv3
license. I would like to open up discussion regarding this subject on the
list now that the new license is completed.
If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for
the project to p
Fred,
Upon seeing your notification of these changes... I tested with Gorm. The
changes appear to cause Gorm to go into an infinite recursion when trying to
select a control (such as a button) in a window.
I have entered a bug for this... https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?20274.
I'm not certain
I just submitted a change that reworks the NSView display mechanism to
us the new method displayRectIgnoringOpacity:inContext:. To me the new
code looks a lot more logical and consistent than the old one, but as
this may only be a private opinion I would like you all to review and
test the new code
On 25 Jun 2007, at 13:34, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
Hi
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:15, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
Do we really need to match Apple's behaviour? This is an
undocumented API so it shouldn't need to conform anyway as third
party developers shoul
