Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread David Ayers
David Ayers schrieb: >> On 11.03.2008, at 19:37, David Ayers wrote: > > We took percautions due to (the old) NSAutoreleasePool optimization: > > * It's a temporary fix to support NSAutoreleasePool optimization > > But now that Richard has committed that "fix" we'd also have to > implement metho

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 13 Mar 2008, at 08:45, David Ayers wrote: David Ayers schrieb: On 11.03.2008, at 19:37, David Ayers wrote: We took percautions due to (the old) NSAutoreleasePool optimization: * It's a temporary fix to support NSAutoreleasePool optimization But now that Richard has committed that "fix"

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread Fred Kiefer
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > > On 13 Mar 2008, at 08:45, David Ayers wrote: > >> David Ayers schrieb: On 11.03.2008, at 19:37, David Ayers wrote: >>> >>> We took percautions due to (the old) NSAutoreleasePool optimization: >>> >>> * It's a temporary fix to support NSAutoreleasePool optim

Re: FW: Continuous Buttons

2008-03-13 Thread Fred Kiefer
Nicola Pero wrote: > FYI - maybe someone more familiar with buttons in gnustep can answer this ? > > Thanks > > > -Original Message- > From: Herbo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:58pm > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Continuous Buttons > > Hello Nicola, > > Quic

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread David Ayers
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: > > > Well I could revert the 'fix'. > > I assumed that it was safer to call -methodForSelector: on an object > than -instanceMethodForSelector: on a class, since any implementation of > the former would have more information to work with (knowing details > about

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 13 Mar 2008, at 16:32, David Ayers wrote: Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: Well I could revert the 'fix'. I assumed that it was safer to call -methodForSelector: on an object than -instanceMethodForSelector: on a class, since any implementation of the former would have more informatio

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread David Ayers
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: > > On 13 Mar 2008, at 16:32, David Ayers wrote: > >> Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: >>> >> - It is invalid to call methods that auto release any objects during >> dealloc/release for any object because these methods get called during >> -emptyPool, > > No ...

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread David Ayers
Fred Kiefer schrieb: > I only follow this discussion with out any deeper knowledge of the > subject, so my suggestion may be utter nonsense. But to me it seems that > NSAutoreleasePool does the right thing. It seems wrong to me to return a > different selector from +instanceMethodForSelector: than

Re: EOFault / NSAutoreleasePool

2008-03-13 Thread Tim McIntosh
On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:03 PM, David Ayers wrote: Fred Kiefer schrieb: I only follow this discussion with out any deeper knowledge of the subject, so my suggestion may be utter nonsense. But to me it seems that NSAutoreleasePool does the right thing. It seems wrong to me to return a differ