В Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:32:43 -0400, Hubert Chathi написа:
I don't think that the combined work still violations LGPLv3, because
section 4 of the LGPLv3 allows you to release the combined works under
any license that you choose, provided that you do certain things, and
the library itself can
В Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:30:52 -0400, Hubert Chathi написа:
Just a thought that came to me, that I thought I'd throw out: one
possibility is to dual-license the GNUstep libraries under bath GPLv2
and LGPLv3 or later. This would allow us to keep GPLv2 applications
(the two big ones that I know
