On 10 Jun 2008, at 22:05, David Ayers wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I here is a patch I have hat locally but never had the chance to
verify.
I'm personally uneasy about committing merely because of the timing.
But I thought I'd bring it up for review just in case folk believe
it is
obviously co
Hello Everyone,
I here is a patch I have hat locally but never had the chance to verify.
I'm personally uneasy about committing merely because of the timing.
But I thought I'd bring it up for review just in case folk believe it is
obviously correct.
It matches the decoding key for thousands sepa
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
>
> On 8 Jun 2008, at 12:08, David Ayers wrote:
>
>> Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
>>
>>> For the base library, reverting the license to LGPLv2 should be easy,
>>> but I'd also like the next stable release to mark all non-macosx stuff
>>> as deprecated ... on t
On 10 Jun 2008, at 19:25, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
But without providing an
alternative header to include. But in fact it seems that many of
those
declarations already exist in GSCategories.h. Sorry I should have
checked earlier. [Yet there are some declarations that are not
there.
On 10 Jun 2008, at 18:47, David Ayers wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:28, David Ayers wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
Where we have methods which are GNUstep specific, they ought to
be in
If you have a better idea of how to go about this sort of thin
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
>
> On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:28, David Ayers wrote:
>
>> Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
>>
>>> Where we have methods which are GNUstep specific, they ought to be in
>>> If you have a better idea of how to go about this sort of thing I'm very
>>> willing to listen (
On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:28, David Ayers wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
Where we have methods which are GNUstep specific, they ought to be in
If you have a better idea of how to go about this sort of thing I'm
very
willing to listen (even time consuming alternatives if you want to
vo
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
> Where we have methods which are GNUstep specific, they ought to be in
> the additions library ... so assuming we get round to moving them,
> anyone using them will need to change their software to include the
> appropriate headers. A small change, but still one
On 10 Jun 2008, at 14:28, David Ayers wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
I believe that marking features that will be merely moved to -
additions
as deprecated is misleading. To me deprecation means prepare for
removal... i.e. adapt all your code. If it just means "we are
thinking
