On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Matt Rice ratm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
I make these changes and you can comment on them.
It turned out that the patch I made had a big problem. :-)
The new code in itself
Matt Rice wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Matt Rice ratm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
I make these changes and you can comment on them.
It turned out that the patch I made had a big problem. :-)
The
David,
I agree with what you're saying. I think that all of the Gorm libraries
should do this. It would make it easier for people to use them outside of
Gorm.
One thing I think I should also mention is that, in gnustep-make, there seem
to be fragments preinstalled for gswapp. Shouldn't these
Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 12:41 -0500 schrieb Gregory Casamento:
One thing I think I should also mention is that, in gnustep-make,
there seem to be fragments preinstalled for gswapp. Shouldn't these
be moved out of gnustep-make and only be installed if and only if you
install GSWeb etc,
When we switch a menu between horizontal and vertical mode we reorganize
a few menu items. A similar reorganisation happens when we load a NIB
file for a menu. I just commited a change that tries to bring these two
implementations together. For now I just changed the code in NSMenu, the
Fred,
I'll look at it tonight and give you feedback on it ASAP. :)
Thanks! GC
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de wrote:
When we switch a menu between horizontal and vertical mode we reorganize
a few menu items. A similar reorganisation happens when we load a NIB
Don't hurry, I will be way until the weekend and wont have much chance
to work on GNUstep.
Gregory Casamento wrote:
Fred,
I'll look at it tonight and give you feedback on it ASAP. :)
Thanks! GC
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Fred Kiefer fredkie...@gmx.de
mailto:fredkie...@gmx.de
It's not an easy issue and I suggest we think carefully :-)
I'm not a fan of the auxiliary makefile fragments. But I generally
agree with you that we need
to review these issues, and also I like your idea of being able to
check if a library is available
or not - mostly to print a
The infrastructure fragments deal with special types of wrappers
called components (WO/GSWCompoents) which need to be
installed/uninstalled in the correct places.
As far as I know, -make currently does not support Auxiliary
infrastructure make file fragments. I'm not sure if it should
since I
