Checking the ISA reference, it appears that the required atomic
instructions appeared in the 486, so -march=486 should work. I have
an almost identical patch applied locally and it builds correctly with
no modifications to the GNUmakefile, so I'm slightly confused as to
why this fails for
David Chisnall wrote:
On i386, you need -march=i586 or higher for this to work. The
existing code will break at runtime, rather than link time, on an
80486 and earlier, and so I assume (from the fact no one has
complained) that no one is using GNUstep on a 386/486.
Well, how old is that
On 3 May 2009, at 17:26, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
David Chisnall wrote:
On i386, you need -march=i586 or higher for this to work. The
existing code will break at runtime, rather than link time, on an
80486 and earlier, and so I assume (from the fact no one has
complained) that no one is
Sorry, no idea, why this fails for me.
uname -a give this result:
Linux hugo 2.6.27.21-0.1-pae #1 SMP 2009-03-31 14:50:44 +0200 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
But I don't know what gcc relies on. I also read somewhere that you have
to use the link flag -lgcc to use the new build in functions, but this
