On 15 Jun 2009, at 00:26, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
Am 14.06.2009 um 23:10 schrieb Riccardo Mottola:
Hi,
Dave MacLachlan wrote:
Hey there...
I'm looking to add NSCalendar and NSLocale to Foundation. I'm
happy to implement them, but I was hoping to do it on top of ICU (http://site.i
This "block thingy" looks interesting. Oh, while we're on the topic of
multi-processors, I've invented an algorithm that allows parallel
lock-less insertions on a linked list. Could be useful for
NSConnections, as it's WAY more efficient than anything else I've ever
seen (and, yes, I am including N
On 15 Jun 2009, at 09:28, Jamie Ramone wrote:
This "block thingy" looks interesting. Oh, while we're on the topic of
multi-processors, I've invented an algorithm that allows parallel
lock-less insertions on a linked list. Could be useful for
NSConnections, as it's WAY more efficient than anythin
В Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:56:40 +0100, Richard Frith-Macdonald написа:
> On 14 Jun 2009, at 17:20, Dave MacLachlan wrote:
>> Google has signed off on having them submitted to the project, so the
>> legal steps are taken care of already.
>
> Including copyright assignment to the FSF? That's a requirem
It is still readily available ( for instance, http://www.opencsw.org/packages/libicu
), and is required by common software such as OpenOffice. I
remember looking into it a few years ago for my job, when estimating
the effort to support non-English languages in our application.
--Robert
On
Hi Dave,
Dave MacLachlan wrote:
Hey there...
I'm looking to add NSCalendar and NSLocale to Foundation. I'm happy to
implement them, but I was hoping to do it on top of ICU
(http://site.icu-project.org/).
Are we willing to add a dependency on ICU to gnustep?
The ICU license is GNU GPL compa
Hi,
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
Really? SUN should use it:
from http://site.icu-project.org/:
Thanks, I am capable of looking up that myself. In fact, i even did
before replying to the email.
Besides, many of those references are more or less just there to make
"number".
What does i
Riccardo,
I would concur, but IIRC from when I looked at it a couple of years
ago, there is basically a pure C API and a C++ API side-by-side. The
C API lacks an interface to the complex text layout engine, which
wouldn't be needed for Locale support. I am pretty sure I got it to
build
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:42 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 15 Jun 2009, at 09:28, Jamie Ramone wrote:
>
>> This "block thingy" looks interesting. Oh, while we're on the topic of
>> multi-processors, I've invented an algorithm that allows parallel
>> lock-less insertions on a linked list. Could be
> I would concur, but IIRC from when I looked at it a couple of years
> ago, there is basically a pure C API and a C++ API side-by-side. The
Just to save you some time, don't use the C API, as it doesnt work
properly. I went through this a couple of weeks ago. Did a C version,
got odd results
Ouch. That is good to know.
We ended up not doing the localization work anyway. The customer
wanting it didn't want to fund it.
We have no C++ code, but tons of C code (some around 30 years old)
which would need this if the idea ever comes 'round again.
--Robert
On Jun 15, 2009, at 4:1
11 matches
Mail list logo
