(Typo fixes to avoid possible confusion; sorry.)
Явор Доганов wrote:
> Every shared library (in /lib and /usr/lib) should be packaged as
> libfooN and libfoo-dev (in rare cases libfoo2-dev).
s/libfoo2-dev/libfooN-dev/
> that use the library to depend on libfoo-dev and to automatically
s/depen
On 4 Jan 2010, at 16:34, Nicolas Roard wrote:
afaik the main "client" of poseAs is Camaelon (I used it to swap
images on the fly) -- but considering the progresses on GSTheme it
should be fine to deprecate poseAs.
Camaelon doesn't build with current GNUstep, so I don't think that's a
problem
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> Am 02.01.2010 16:22, schrieb David Chisnall:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> With the non-fragile ABI, Apple removed support for class posing. This
>> makes sense, because it's no longer possible to guarantee that the class
>> has the same ivar layout.
>
Am 02.01.2010 16:22, schrieb David Chisnall:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> With the non-fragile ABI, Apple removed support for class posing. This
> makes sense, because it's no longer possible to guarantee that the class
> has the same ivar layout.
>
> I'm tempted to do the same thing for our non-fragile A
2010/1/4 Matt Rice :
>> AFAIK, since gorm.app is already part of debian, that package should be
>> used instead of including convenience copies of code, see [1] for
>> details. On fact, the current gnustep-dl2 package depends on gorm.app
>> for its build and installation. But right now the public l
El 03/01/2010 21:26, Matt Rice escribió:
[.]
> I'm not sure if it would be against debian policy to ship the Gorm
> bundle with DBModeler.app that is another option if possible since the
> gorm bundle is like a plugin for Gorm which DBModeler communicates
> with, its not entirely necessary, but
Federico Giménez Nieto wrote:
> 2010/1/4 Matt Rice :
> > Ahh, sorry I meant the 'package GDL2Palette bundle with DBModeler',
> > adding a dependency on the existing Gorm.app package to it,
>
> Yes, in my opinion it should be enough to add a dependency on gorm.app
> to the new gnustep-dl2-devtools
Matt Rice wrote:
> Yavor mentions that "(although they're intended to be public
> libraries, nothing in GNUstep uses them)"
Oh, that was misleading. What I meant is that no package in Debian
currently uses gnustep-dl2 (its libraries or whatever).
> but DBModeler isn't really a standalone applica
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
> El 03/01/2010 21:26, Matt Rice escribió:
> [.]
>> I'm not sure if it would be against debian policy to ship the Gorm
>> bundle with DBModeler.app that is another option if possible since the
>> gorm bundle is like a plugin for Gor
