On 28 Feb 2010, at 08:42, ici...@mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Although this works, it is a really, really bad way of creating a singleton.
I copied it from the apple developer pages...
:-)
I thought +initialize would be called on program startup for every
class.
I guess you are
On 27 Feb 2010, at 18:39, David Chisnall wrote:
I've now fixed this case in libobjc2. Unfortunately, someone decided to
'helpfully' reindent the version of ObjectiveC2.framework in GNUstep, which
means that diffs from libobjc2 no longer cleanly apply in ObjectiveC2 (nor to
diffs against
Hi!
After porting David's fixes from libobjc2 to the Objective2 framework
@synchronized(class) works fine. Thank you all for your quick responses.
TOM
Zitat von Richard Frith-Macdonald rich...@tiptree.demon.co.uk:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 08:42, ici...@mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Although
On 28 Feb 2010, at 08:42, ici...@mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Although this works, it is a really, really bad way of creating a singleton.
I copied it from the apple developer pages...
This is rarely a good idea, unfortunately. Apple's API documentation is very
good, but their example code
On 28 Feb 2010, at 15:06, Gregory Casamento wrote:
Just one thing here... if conforming to the coding standards is going
to be a point of contention, then I don't think we need to be very
strict on them, at least not until after the code is completed and
stabilized.
GC
On Sun, Feb 28,
I think one thing we seriously need to examine is how critical support
for compilers which do not support C99 really is.
Do any of the embedded platforms require gcc 2.95.x?
GC
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald
rich...@tiptree.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at
My apologies... I misunderstood the difficulty here. I'd forgotten
that there is ObjectiveC2 and libobjc2. :)
I'm not certain what the right solution here is beyond continuing to
backport as best we can to ObjectiveC2.
However, I think the question I asked in the previous email I sent is
still
On 28 Feb 2010, at 17:22, Gregory Casamento wrote:
My apologies... I misunderstood the difficulty here. I'd forgotten
that there is ObjectiveC2 and libobjc2. :)
I'm not certain what the right solution here is beyond continuing to
backport as best we can to ObjectiveC2.
I don't think it's
I just tried to reproduce this behaviour and failed to.
On which application are you seeing this and probably more important,
which GNUstep backend are you using? Do you have a theme enable?
Am 27.02.2010 18:54, schrieb ici...@mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at:
Looks like NSTabView in trunk is currently
Hi,
Actually, David's original comment is a bit wide of the mark anyway ... changes
to the ObjectiveC2 code are rather more than just reindentation as it needed a
bug fix or two and quite a few changes to fix c99isms which prevented it
building on older systems (and the whole point of a
On 1 Mar 2010, at 00:12, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
It is not that I removed and changed stuff randomly, I just changed it where
I needed it to get things to compile.
Yes, I think we all understand that.
So I'd like the compatibility library to continue to compile. I'm perfectly
fine to
11 matches
Mail list logo
