Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Matt Rice
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote: > Hey guys...  Matt and I just talked via IM and he reminded me of a > really important point. > > The functionality using proxies works fine on 32bit machines, but is > broken on 64 bit machines due to the fact that this bug: > > http://g

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 29 Mar 2010, at 07:37, Gregory Casamento wrote: > Hey guys... Matt and I just talked via IM and he reminded me of a > really important point. > > The functionality using proxies works fine on 32bit machines, but is > broken on 64 bit machines due to the fact that this bug: > > http://gcc.gn

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Nicola Pero
On 26 Mar 2010, at 20:55, Fred Kiefer wrote: Before FOSDEM we were planing a coordinated release of the GNUstep core components. In the meantime a lot has happened. Base was completely rewritten, Is gnustep-base really ready for a release so shortly after a large rewrite ? I assume we'r

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread David Chisnall
On 29 Mar 2010, at 13:44, Nicola Pero wrote: > On 26 Mar 2010, at 20:55, Fred Kiefer wrote: > >> Before FOSDEM we were planing a coordinated release of the GNUstep core >> components. In the meantime a lot has happened. Base was completely >> rewritten, > > Is gnustep-base really ready for a rel

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Nicola Pero
Before FOSDEM we were planing a coordinated release of the GNUstep core components. In the meantime a lot has happened. Base was completely rewritten, Is gnustep-base really ready for a release so shortly after a large rewrite ? I assume we're talking of an unstable release ? ;-) Most

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Gregory Casamento
Wolfgang... The patch looks good. Please go ahead and apply it and make the change in GSNibLoading.m as well, if you wish. Thanks, GC On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Wolfgang Lux wrote: > Gregory Casamento wrote: > >> Top level objects in the nib are the responsibility of the controller. >>

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Fred Kiefer
Mhm, I already did all of that yesterday... But there is more to do. We now need to change all the places where we load NIB (or Gorm or XIB) files to free the top level objects. The code is a lot cleaner now, but as far as memory leaks are concerned we are almost back to square one. We now leak al

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi I haven't kept up with the state of development/readiness of the windows theme, but I really don't agree with forcibly changing the default theme ... I know it makes me really irate on the odd occasion when Apple change default behaviors on OSX, and I have to look for the way to revert to

Re: Next GNUstep release?

2010-03-29 Thread Wolfgang Lux
Hi Fred! Mhm, I already did all of that yesterday... But there is more to do. We now need to change all the places where we load NIB (or Gorm or XIB) files to free the top level objects. The code is a lot cleaner now, but as far as memory leaks are concerned we are almost back to square one.