Re: Heads Up: ABI Change

2011-02-11 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 10 Feb 2011, at 14:14, Stefan Bidi wrote: > Hmm, I guess I should mentioned I messed around with the NSDateFormatter and > NSNumberFormatter ivars, as well. In order to support OS X 10.4+ methods I > had to add about 4-5 extra ivars to each of those classes. Seeing as I did > this a few w

Re: Heads Up: ABI Change

2011-02-11 Thread Stefan Bidi
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald < rich...@tiptree.demon.co.uk> wrote: > No ... this sort of stuff rarely actually breaks anything (how often does > anyone want to subclass these things) but we have a 'contract' with our uses > not to break ABI compatibility for stable rele

problem compiling base on NetBSD

2011-02-11 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, on NetBSD (x86, gcc4) since this morning I get: Linking library libgnustep-base ... unix/obj/subproject.o: In function `wRelease': /home/multix/gnustep-cvs/devmodules/core/base/Source/unix/GSRunLoopCtxt.m:44: multiple definition of `GSBaseCache' Additions/obj/subproject.o:/home/multix/gnus

UTI supoort for -canReadItemWithDataConformingToTypes: ?

2011-02-11 Thread Banlu Kemiyatorn
Hi, Does GNUstep have a support for UTI to implement canReadItemWithDataConformingToTypes: for NSPasteboard? Can it adopt this one by Eric from EtoileFoundation? I just need something to define binary streams properly. Thanks Banlu. http://svn.gna.org/svn/etoile/trunk/Etoile/Frameworks/EtoileFound

Re: Heads Up: ABI Change

2011-02-11 Thread David Chisnall
Hi Stefan, On 11 Feb 2011, at 19:02, Stefan Bidi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald > wrote: >> No ... this sort of stuff rarely actually breaks anything (how often does >> anyone want to subclass these things) but we have a 'contract' with our uses >> not to br

Re: Heads Up: ABI Change

2011-02-11 Thread Stefan Bidi
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:42 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > I've not looked at the code in detail, but I thought you were creating a > private subclass for the old and new behaviours - would it not be possible > to simply return a private subclass instance from the constructors and no