On 09.05.2011 22:01, Eric Wasylishen wrote:
On 2011-05-08, at 12:47 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 08 May 2011 01:32:58 +0200 Von: Riccardo
Mottola An: Eric
Wasylishen CC: Developer
GNUstep Betreff: Re: Image size, DPI (was
Re: Gorm is broken)
Hi,
On 2011-05-08, at 12:47 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sun, 08 May 2011 01:32:58 +0200
>> Von: Riccardo Mottola
>> An: Eric Wasylishen
>> CC: Developer GNUstep
>> Betreff: Re: Image size, DPI (was Re: Gorm is broken)
>
>> Hi,
>>> On a related note,
On 2011-05-09, at 2:18 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> On 06.05.2011 03:01, Eric Wasylishen wrote:
>> Author: ericwa
>> Date: Fri May 6 03:01:21 2011
>> New Revision: 32990
>>
>> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep?rev=32990&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * Tests/gui/NSView/NSView_frame_bounds.m: Add some mo
Is this of relevance for GNUstep?
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/fhs-discuss/2011-May/01.html
regards,
lars
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
Le 7 mai 2011 à 23:53, Eric Wasylishen a écrit :
> On 2011-05-07, at 6:26 AM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
>>> Yes. However, the value 72 dpi is important in GNUstep/Cocoa because 1
>>> point in the window's base coordinate system = 1 pixel, and a point is 1/72
>>> inch. (even though it's an arbit
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 00:22, Truls Becken wrote:
>
> NTFS can do this on its own, without any cygwin hacks. On Vista and 7
> you have full support for symlinks, while on XP you have NTFS junction
> points.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link
>
I'd find it more tasteful to use Cy
On 06.05.2011 03:01, Eric Wasylishen wrote:
Author: ericwa
Date: Fri May 6 03:01:21 2011
New Revision: 32990
URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep?rev=32990&view=rev
Log:
* Tests/gui/NSView/NSView_frame_bounds.m: Add some more tests
of setBoundsSize:. They are currently failing (but pass on
O
