On 20 Aug 2013, at 22:34, Stefan Bidi wrote:
> I'm re-writing the CoreBase string formatting function (printf with %@
> support) and while going through the printf(), Apple docs and other sources
> on the internet I ran across a potential problem with some of the assumptions
> made when defin
Ah, thanks. I remember I brought this up a while ago when I first wrote
the formatting code and ended up with CFIndex equivalent to long, but
couldn't remember if that was correct or not.
Thanks for clarifying.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Eric Wasylishen wrote:
> Hey Stef,
>
> I think wha
Hey Stef,
I think what GNUstep is doing is OK...
On 2013-08-20, at 3:34 PM, Stefan Bidi wrote:
> I'm re-writing the CoreBase string formatting function (printf with %@
> support) and while going through the printf(), Apple docs and other sources
> on the internet I ran across a potential prob
I'm re-writing the CoreBase string formatting function (printf with %@
support) and while going through the printf(), Apple docs and other sources
on the internet I ran across a potential problem with some of the
assumptions made when defining these types.
I understand that despite being very port
Le 19.08.2013 23:39, Gregory Casamento a écrit :
Yes, I will be working on support for it.
Right now GNUsteps libraries support XIB files, but Gorm itself
doesnt. I am working on XIB support for the current version of the
format. The XML you showed doesnt seem significantly different,
though
