Re: Serious GORM bug

2014-01-05 Thread Fred Kiefer
On 04.01.2014 12:45, Jamie Ramone wrote: > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote: >> Am 04.01.2014 um 00:17 schrieb Jamie Ramone : >> >> Well $hit! I ran on a VM with Ubuntu 13.10...same problem: >> >> Starting program: /SystemApps/Gorm.app/Gorm >> [Thread debugging using libthread_db

Re: libobjc2 objc_setassociatedobject issue

2014-01-05 Thread Doug Warren
As a hopeful final follow-up to this. I opened a bug https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?4 with a GNUstep style failing test that I verified fails on 1.24.6 on Ubuntu along with the fix I mentioned above. Hopefully it'll be integrated or someone else will be inspired by a failing test to

int vs. void pointer

2014-01-05 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, in reference to: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/gui/trunk/Source/GSDisplayServer.m?r1=37026&r2=37533 is it correct to get an int and return it as a void* ? I get a warning there. I suppose int goes to void, not a pointer. perhaps the method shold accept a void* as a win? Riccard

Re: int vs. void pointer

2014-01-05 Thread Stefan Bidi
I don't know of any platform where an int is larger than a pointer, so I think it is safe to do this. You should cast it to into first and the warning will disappear: return (int)win. On Jan 5, 2014 2:45 PM, "Riccardo Mottola" wrote: > Hi, > > in reference to: > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep

Re: int vs. void pointer

2014-01-05 Thread Niels Grewe
Am 05.01.2014 um 20:45 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Hi, > > in reference to: > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/gui/trunk/Source/GSDisplayServer.m?r1=37026&r2=37533 > > is it correct to get an int and return it as a void* ? I get a warning there. > I suppose int goes to void, not a point