> On Jul 14, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald > <richardfrithmacdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> A XML plist parser does not need to be a full XML parser, and can skip the >> DTD validation altogether (which is what I plan on doing in CoreBase). The >> format is brain-dead simple and a XML plist parser can go through data >> efficiently without ever having to validate, returning NULL on a syntax >> error. > > Yes, that seems to be another argument for not bothering to keep our own > version of the DTD: people aren’t going to check it anyway. > > FYI, I put version 1.0 of the DTD on gnustep.org <http://gnustep.org/> in case anyone wants to use it (Both plist-1_0.dtd and PropertyList-1.0.dtd)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
