Hi,
Gregory Casamento wrote:
1. Savannah's git support is abysmally terrible. It is manual and it
takes the gnu hackers forever to respond. People can say "help them
out" all they want but that is impossible since i already have too
much on my hands. There are discussions now on the Savannah list
about moving to another repo management software (gogs and gitlab in
particular). If that ever happens we will revisit making Savannah the
master.
correct. It is not a project leader duty to help out there. It is a nice
option if possible, but it can't be something required.
2. The sheer number of tools available for use with github.com
<http://github.com>: code review, bug tracking, ci, static analysis,
etc, etc... plus the exposure to other developers due to the
ubiquitous use of the platform is hard to ignore.
So due to these two factors and more I believe that this is the only
possible decision. Now, I will address your specific points...
Although I am not happy with ther decision, I won't object. If somebody
will question why we are not on Savannah or other service, we shall
reply that at the time of this writing, the GIT repository offered was
not flexible enough.
Riccardo
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev