> Am 02.12.2018 um 18:12 schrieb Wolfgang Lux :
>
>
>
>> Am 02.12.2018 um 17:28 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>>
>> Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>>> What platform are you on? Why don’t you take the path the packages take and
>>> use base clang, and libobjc2?
>>
>> because libobjc2 I always
> Am 02.12.2018 um 17:28 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>
> Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
>> What platform are you on? Why don’t you take the path the packages take and
>> use base clang, and libobjc2?
>
> because libobjc2 I always have issues with that setup or clang or something.
>
> I like to
Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
What platform are you on? Why don’t you take the path the packages take and use
base clang, and libobjc2?
because libobjc2 I always have issues with that setup or clang or something.
I like to use GCC and its runtime.
I definitely don’t recommend to use the
Hi
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2. Dec 2018, at 14:30, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded OpenBSD to 6.4, including all packages.
> The compiler did not change in revision, I guess it was just updated, so gcc
> is still 4.9 from ports.
>
> I recompile GNUstep from scratch and
Hi,
I just upgraded OpenBSD to 6.4, including all packages.
The compiler did not change in revision, I guess it was just updated, so
gcc is still 4.9 from ports.
I recompile GNUstep from scratch and it fails:
Compiling file runtime.c ...
In file included from runtime.c:35:0:
