On 09/02/2021 16:20, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 29 Jan 2021, at 16:28, David Chisnall wrote:
We have given up supporting MinGW for snmalloc and I am considering
optionally supporting snmalloc for Objective-C object allocations since it is
much faster than the system malloc on
> On 29 Jan 2021, at 16:28, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> We have given up supporting MinGW for snmalloc and I am considering
> optionally supporting snmalloc for Objective-C object allocations since it is
> much faster than the system malloc on most platforms and is particularly good
> for
