On Dec 10, 2005, at 5:49 PM, Quentin Mathé wrote:
I suppose by 'Savannah' the second time, you mean 'Subversion' in fact ?
I think Subversion would be a better choice, because Arch is
complicated to use imho. Arch would be a way more radical move than
cvs to svn. However I would prefer movin
Le 9 déc. 05 à 00:11, Adam Fedor a écrit :
FYI, savannah.gnu.org has Arch support now. There's at least a
possibility it will have Savannah as well by the end of the month.
If not though, we should look into moving to Arch.
Hi Adam,
I suppose by 'Savannah' the second time, you mean 'Subve
FYI, savannah.gnu.org has Arch support now. There's at least a
possibility it will have Savannah as well by the end of the month. If
not though, we should look into moving to Arch.
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
