Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #67

2012-04-21 Thread greg . casamento
See http://gnustep.dnsalias.org:8080/job/gnustep/67/changes Changes: [thebeing] Move declarations around (patch by Phillipe Roussel) -- [...truncated 2594 lines...] checking for cairo-ft... yes checking CAIRO_FT_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/cairo

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #67

2012-04-21 Thread Niels Grewe
Hi Greg, I think this kind of email is what people were fearing that we would be getting when you setup Jenkins. I identify a few issues: On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 07:38:42AM -0400, greg.casame...@gmail.com wrote: See http://gnustep.dnsalias.org:8080/job/gnustep/67/changes Changes:

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #67

2012-04-21 Thread Gregory Casamento
Niels, The fact that we have had 30+ successful builds without any issues seems to indicate a good track record with respect to Jenkins and the ci effort. Honestly I am not going to put the messages on their own list because that list will become a black hole and will be all too easy for people

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #67

2012-04-21 Thread Niels Grewe
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:14:31AM -0400, Gregory Casamento wrote: Niels, The fact that we have had 30+ successful builds without any issues seems to indicate a good track record with respect to Jenkins and the ci effort. Honestly I am not going to put the messages on their own list because

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #67

2012-04-21 Thread Gregory Casamento
But we haven't had a sub par experience. Like I said, Jenkins has been in operation for about a month and many successful builds have been run. If you're asking me to say I will 100% guarantee that unforeseen errors may cause a problem on the server then I can't. What I suspect is that this is

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #67

2012-04-21 Thread Gregory Casamento
I found the issue. I accidentally changed permissions in the build directory when I was installing something else on the server. The problem should be corrected shortly. My apologies to anyone who thought this was because of any instability in a process which has been working seamlessly for