Cocotron vs GNUstep

2010-03-18 Thread Vincent Richomme
What are the philosophies between these 2 projects and why dont' you share your efforts ? ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Re: Cocotron vs GNUstep

2010-03-18 Thread Markus Hitter
. Cocotron pro's: - Tight Xcode integration. - Single script installer - complains about installation issues are rare. - MS Windows is the primary target - an advantage for those wanting to deploy on Windows. - Standalone applications. - Very low get-started-barrier. - Deals well

Re: Cocotron vs GNUstep

2010-03-18 Thread David Chisnall
On 18 Mar 2010, at 19:37, Vincent Richomme wrote: What are the philosophies between these 2 projects and why dont' you share your efforts ? You'd be better off asking that to the Cocotron team. They started around 15 years after GNUstep and decided to work from scratch rather than

Re: Cocotron vs GNUstep

2010-03-18 Thread David Chisnall
On 18 Mar 2010, at 22:40, Markus Hitter wrote: - MS Windows is the primary target - an advantage for those wanting to deploy on Windows. For those who haven't been following Gregory's latest work on the Windows theme for GNUstep:

Re: Cocotron

2006-12-28 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 28 Dec 2006, at 00:35, Tima Vaisburd wrote: I disagree that we should adopt the single platform approach ... my feeling is that what they have right is the idea that interface completeness is unnecessary if you have good enough feature coverage. So I think we should be concentrating on