All,Given that there have been great strides in supporting GNUstep under MinGW, I believe it to be redundant to continue to support CYGWIN since it's not currently being maintained and since MinGW does everything needed to get GNUstep working properly under Windows.For this reason, I believe that s
On 17 Jan 2006, at 06:01, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
All,
Given that there have been great strides in supporting GNUstep
under MinGW, I believe it to be redundant to continue to support
CYGWIN since it's not currently being maintained and since MinGW
does everything needed to get GNUs
Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, since cygwin is supposed to emulate unix, I think gnustep should
> treat cygwin as a unix variant .. so maybe little/no special support is
> necessary.
Unless one wants to use win32 backend ;) It worked several releases ago, but
in
Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; GNUstep Developers
Sent: Tue 17 Jan 2006 02:26:02 AM EST
Subject: Re: Deprecation of CYGWIN support
Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, since cygwin is supposed to emulate
Hello,
On Tuesday, January 17, 2006, at 07:01 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Given that there have been great strides in supporting GNUstep under
MinGW, I believe it to be redundant to continue to support CYGWIN since
it's not currently being maintained and since MinGW does everything
nee
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Tue 17 Jan 2006 02:38:23 PM EST
Subject: Re: Deprecation of CYGWIN support
Hello,
On Tuesday, January 17, 2006, at 07:01 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
> Given that there have been great strides in supporting GNUstep under
> MinGW,
Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unless one wants to use win32 backend ;)
> We already have MinGW.
I meant win32 backend in GNUstep compiled by cygwin, of course. The rest of my
letter explained my reasons and why they are not significant.
--
CTED]>
Cc: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Wed 18 Jan 2006 02:41:23 AM EST
Subject: Re: Deprecation of CYGWIN support
Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unless one wants to use win32 backend ;)
> We already have MinGW.
I meant win32 backend in GNUstep compiled by
