Please find the attached patch.
Basically, it just coerces all of the problem places to id prior to coercing it
to GSIMapVal/GSIMapKey/etc. This fixes the problem, but I'm not sure it's the
cleanest solution.
I ran a test recently on gcc 3.4.3, using the attached simple test.c program.
I got t
Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
> Please find the attached patch.
>
> Basically, it just coerces all of the problem places to id prior to coercing
> it
> to GSIMapVal/GSIMapKey/etc. This fixes the problem, but I'm not sure it's the
> cleanest solution.
>
> I ran a test recently on gcc 3.4.3, us
On 2005-10-07 08:20:56 + David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but this is not what we are doing, as long and int are distinct types.
As you noticed this would have been an error in previous versions of GCC.
In our case there are the special ObjC semantics that any objects could
be matched
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
> However, while this cast to union feature is non-standard anyway its
> behavior is therefore hard to classify as a definite bug, I do think the
> new behavior is non-intuitive, and it would be better if it handled
> assignment of any pointer to a void* member and
David,
--- David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gregory John Casamento schrieb:
> > Please find the attached patch.
> >
> > Basically, it just coerces all of the problem places to id prior to
> coercing it
> > to GSIMapVal/GSIMapKey/etc. This fixes the problem, but I'm not sure it's
> the
>
David,
--- David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
>
> > However, while this cast to union feature is non-standard anyway its
> > behavior is therefore hard to classify as a definite bug, I do think the
> > new behavior is non-intuitive, and it would be better i
On 2005-10-07 13:49:55 + Gregory John Casamento
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, should I commit my changes? Should we submit a bug to the gcc
maintainers?
Um ... I committed them ... on the assumption that there won't be a quick
fix to gcc.
However, I think it would be good if the gc
Richard,
--- Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-10-07 13:49:55 + Gregory John Casamento
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, should I commit my changes? Should we submit a bug to the gcc
> > maintainers?
>
> Um ... I committed them ... on the assumption that
Got it, nevermind. :)
--- Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard,
>
> --- Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 2005-10-07 13:49:55 + Gregory John Casamento
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So, should I commit my changes? Should we subm
