doh
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matt Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: GPLv2 licensing issues
To: Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am still not sure whether thi
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:40:34 -0700, "Matt Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am still not sure whether this problem actually exists. As far as I
>> understand the GPL it only transfers to libraries that are statically
>>
I think another good FAQ question to look at is:
"
*Can I release a program under the GPL which I developed using non-free
tools?*
Which programs you used to edit the source code, or to compile it, or study
it, or record it, usually makes no difference for issues concerning the
licensing of that
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:12:17 -0500, "Stefan Bidigaray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think another good FAQ question to look at is: " *Can I release a
> program under the GPL which I developed using non-free tools?*
[...]
> However, if you link non-free libraries with the source code, that
> wou
