On 10. Mrz 2006, at 20:13 Uhr, Jeremy Bettis wrote:
You can't have every platform tested for every release.
But you need to decide (and declare!) what platforms are actually
tested prior a release. Otherwise a stable release is pretty useless,
no?
For GNUstep this means that there needs
Alex Perez wrote:
Shouldn't we make it a formal policy to test under mingw before making
any RELEASE? Is there a checklist everyone much follow before making a
release? It should probably be on the wiki, perhaps locked/in
review-submit-only mode so it can only be edited by the respective
package.
2006-03-06 14:57:21.708 defaults.exe[3680] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE
value ('/etc/GNUstep/GNUstep.conf') is not an absolute path.
Please rebuild GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config
file.
What do I do wrong? As far as I can tell I already build GNUstep-base
specifying
defaults.exe[3680] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value
('/etc/GNUstep/GNUstep.conf') is not an absolute path. Please
rebuild GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config file.
What do I do wrong? As far as I can tell I already build
GNUstep-base
specifying a valid path to the config file.
If you
On 7 Mar 2006, at 06:47, Tom Koelman wrote:
Is there maybe some documentation about the way this configuration
file configuration works?
Yes ... 'configure --help' for the make and base packages, though
this changed quite a bit between the last release and the current
code in svn.
For
program or some other GNUstep using
program I get the following:
2006-03-06 14:57:21.708 defaults.exe[3680] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value
('/etc/GNUstep/GNUstep.conf') is not an absolute path. Please rebuild
GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config file.
What do I do wrong? As far as I can
GNUstep using
program I get the following:
2006-03-06 14:57:21.708 defaults.exe[3680] GNUSTEP_CONFIG_FILE value
('/etc/GNUstep/GNUstep.conf') is not an absolute path. Please rebuild
GNUstep-base specifying a valid path to the config file.
What do I do wrong? As far as I can tell I already
