Hi...
As some might know, we are using GNUstep base intensively on windows.
We are currently in the phase of porting our code to 64bit. So GNUstep base
must also run in 64 bit on windows. After some studying of the code
(GNUstep base 1.16.3)
we already have seen a bunch of areas where changes ha
Roland Schwingel wrote:
> Hi...
>
> As some might know, we are using GNUstep base intensively on windows.
> We are currently in the phase of porting our code to 64bit. So GNUstep
> base
> must also run in 64 bit on windows. After some studying of the code
> (GNUstep base 1.16.3)
> we already have
On 22 Oct 2008, at 09:58, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Is there some preference on your side, how we should organize our
patches and the
communication with you, as the changes might cover a wider range of
code ?
First, thanks very much for offering to provide these patches ... I
think adding
Hi Richard...
Thanks for your reply!
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote on 24.10.2008 08:04:19:
> > [...]
> First, thanks very much for offering to provide these patches ... I
> think adding windows 64bit support would be great.
>
> The best way to manage patches is to add them to the GNUstep patc
Hi...
As already announced some days ago I will now start to submit the
patches for GNUstep base/libobjc to be working natively on 64bit windows.
This first patch submitted (patch #6668) in savannah's patch manager
covers the libobjc runtime. It is basically fixing gcc 4.4 warnings and
only
Hi...
A few days ago, I already submitted the patch for gnustep libobjc to run
on windows 64bit.
Here is now the patch for gnustep-base (I wanted to give a bit more
testing)
The patch for gnustep-base is patch #6677 in savannah's patch manager.
It requires the toolchain from November 15th to
Hi...
A few days ago, I already submitted the patch for gnustep libobjc to run
on windows 64bit.
Here is now the patch for gnustep-base (I wanted to give a bit more testing)
The patch for gnustep-base is patch #6677 in savannah's patch manager.
It requires the toolchain from November 15th to b
Am 11.11.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Roland Schwingel:
Hi...
As already announced some days ago I will now start to submit the
patches for GNUstep base/libobjc to be working natively on 64bit
windows.
This first patch submitted (patch #6668) in savannah's patch
manager covers the libobjc run
On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:23, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Apple has defined NSInteger/NSUInteger with Mac OS 10.5 and also has
changed the method signatures for ALL classes showing these
limitations.
I have seen you have already started to also define these datatypes
and to slowly use it.
Yes.
I
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:23, Roland Schwingel wrote:
>
>> Apple has defined NSInteger/NSUInteger with Mac OS 10.5 and also has
>> changed the method signatures for ALL classes showing these limitations.
>> I have seen you have already started to also define these d
On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:27, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:23, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Apple has defined NSInteger/NSUInteger with Mac OS 10.5 and also has
changed the method signatures for ALL classes showing these
limitations.
I have seen you have
Hi Lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
11.11.2008 19:12:34:
> It would be great of you if you could submit those patches also to
> the GCC mainline via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ so that both forks
> don't diverge even further.
>
> Select "libobjc" as component in bugzilla (and be prepared fo
Am 20.11.2008 um 10:18 schrieb Roland Schwingel:
Hi Lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 11.11.2008 19:12:34:
> It would be great of you if you could submit those patches also
to > the GCC mainline via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ so that
both forks > don't diverge even further.
>
> Select
13 matches
Mail list logo
