No ... but there is little incentive for people to adopt it if it doesn't
help packaging for our target systems.
I agree GNUstep win32 has high priority because the vast amount of win32
machine in existence.
TWW tools(and all the software they packaged) are in GPL license so if an
OS
On 27 Dec 2006, at 12:35, T.J. Yang wrote:
My plan
1. prepare gcc-4.1.1 for Solaris 10 intel (U2, 06/2006 version)
first and down port lower version solaris and sparc cpu.
This is fairly straightforward ... I've done it for 32 bit and
64bit solaris ... you shouldn't have any trouble.
G
From: Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: T.J. Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNUstep packaging by TWW tools
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 10:59:51 +
On 26 Dec 2006, at 20:02, T.J. Yang wrote:
My plan
1. prepare gcc-4.1.1 for Solaris 10 i
On 26 Dec 2006, at 20:02, T.J. Yang wrote:
My plan
1. prepare gcc-4.1.1 for Solaris 10 intel (U2, 06/2006 version)
first and down port lower version solaris and sparc cpu.
This is fairly straightforward ... I've done it for 32 bit and 64bit
solaris ... you shouldn't have any trouble.
2
I am not a software engineer so I can't help on swapping out xlib with
cairo type of projects.
but I want to have a FreeBSD type of packaging build system to maintain
GNUstep.
"make gnustep-core-1.10" will unpack,patch,configure and build gnustep
software components.
It is very wasteful
