All,
I recently recieved an email from the FSF regarding moving to the new GPLv3
license. I would like to open up discussion regarding this subject on the
list now that the new license is completed.
If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for
the project to p
> If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for
> the
> project to proceed is to change the license of our applications (GWorkspace,
> Gorm,
> etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license. All of the libraries
> should
> remain LGPL.
You probably mean tha
Great! What you explained is the intention.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
- Original Message
From: Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:23:27 PM
Subject: RE: Moving GNUstep
2007 8:23:27 PM
> Subject: RE: Moving GNUstep applications to GPLv3
>
>
>> If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for
>> the
>> project to proceed is to change the license of our applications (GWorkspace,
>> Gorm,
>> etc) within GN
On 27 Jun 2007, at 09:09, Fred Kiefer wrote:
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
License as published b
Hi,
On 2007-06-27 02:23:27 +0200 "Nicola Pero"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best
way
for the project to proceed is to change the license of our
applications
(GWorkspace, Gorm, etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:09:37 +0200, Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
> of the library in there:
>This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>modify it under the terms of the GNU Library Genera
ROTECTED]>
To: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: Moving GNUstep applications to GPLv3
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modi
hough.
Yen-Ju
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
- Original Message
From: Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: GNUstep Developers
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: Moving GNUstep applications to GPLv3
I support this change as well. We already have the choice fo
On 6/29/07, Yen-Ju Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe it is worth to wait and see how other big projects do,
like GCC and GNOME.
And see how it affects some aspects where GNUstep will be used,
like web services (GNUstepWeb) or embedded system (mSTEP).
GCC has been requested (required) to mov
- Original Message
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Yen-Ju Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>; GNUstep Developers
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 4:54:52 PM
Subject: Re: Moving GNUstep ap
11 matches
Mail list logo
