wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment. It
seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the
other.
The move would simply be to keep the old system active for all
currently open bugs and to open only new bugs on the new system.
This would
these old bugs.
Fred
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 22 May 2011 19:08:17 -0400
Von: Gregory Casamento greg.casame...@gmail.com
An: Developer GNUstep gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Betreff: Moving the bug system to GNA
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA
,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment. It
seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the
other.
The move would simply be to keep the old system active for all
currently open bugs and to open only new bugs on the new system.
This would allow
...@gmail.com
An: Developer GNUstep gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Betreff: Moving the bug system to GNA
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment. It
seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the
other.
The move would simply be to keep the old
liked our move
to GNA and if the division irritates you, we should move the sources back
home. It was done back then because GNA had svn support before gnu
savannah...
my 2 cents,
R
On 05/23/2011 01:08 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA
to GNA and if the division irritates you, we should move
the sources back home. It was done back then because GNA had svn
support before gnu savannah...
my 2 cents,
R
On 05/23/2011 01:08 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug
On 23 May 2011, at 14:28, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote:
I like the idea but I doubt it would make users life easier. For instance, a
user found a bug and google for it and will end up with mixed of two site,
asking themselves which one to use. The search for existing bugs by site
interface could
cents,
R
On 05/23/2011 01:08 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment. It
seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the
other.
The move would simply be to keep the old system
I simply would like to have things in one place. Right now we're
spread between GNA and Savannah.
It sounds like a good idea - I support it.
But, I would recommend that:
* we put up extensive announcements on the web site, mailing list,
etc.
* we try to migrate over the open bugs. I
/23/2011 01:08 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm thinking about moving the bug system to GNA at the moment. It
seems silly to have the code in one place and the bug system in the
other.
The move would simply be to keep the old system active for all
Hey guys... this isn't a direct response to Nicola, I'm just adding a
few more thoughts here.
Simply put we either need GNUstep to be on either savannah or GNA.
My concern about moving it back to savannah is that it would be
disruptive for anyone who has GNUstep currently checked out.
First off, I am not against moving the rest of the project over to GNA.
Basing it on the FSF or the FSF-E is all the same to me. Although I know
more of the European FSF people in person.
Having the bulk of GNUstep in one place sounds like a nice idea. We
could go either way. What I didn't
Am 23.05.2011 um 19:02 schrieb Gregory Casamento:
Hey guys... this isn't a direct response to Nicola, I'm just adding a
few more thoughts here.
Simply put we either need GNUstep to be on either savannah or GNA.
My concern about moving it back to savannah is that it would be
disruptive for
Could we add a script to Makefile and leave the svn alone for a while
until most are updated to the script? Could be fun to think that it
will actually work out remotely or not.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
h...@goldelico.com wrote:
Am 23.05.2011 um 19:02 schrieb
Sorry, I just read your first line!
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn obj...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we add a script to Makefile and leave the svn alone for a while
until most are updated to the script? Could be fun to think that it
will actually work out remotely or not.
On
Am 23.05.2011 um 13:38 schrieb Fred Kiefer:
Having the bulk of GNUstep in one place sounds like a nice idea.
Very true.
David
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
16 matches
Mail list logo
