Am 20.11.2008 um 10:18 schrieb Roland Schwingel:
Hi Lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 11.11.2008 19:12:34:
> It would be great of you if you could submit those patches also
to > the GCC mainline via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ so that
both forks > don't diverge even further.
>
> Select
Hi Lars
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
11.11.2008 19:12:34:
> It would be great of you if you could submit those patches also to
> the GCC mainline via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ so that both forks
> don't diverge even further.
>
> Select "libobjc" as component in bugzilla (and be prepared fo
On 17 Nov 2008, at 17:27, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:23, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Apple has defined NSInteger/NSUInteger with Mac OS 10.5 and also has
changed the method signatures for ALL classes showing these
limitations.
I have seen you have
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:23, Roland Schwingel wrote:
>
>> Apple has defined NSInteger/NSUInteger with Mac OS 10.5 and also has
>> changed the method signatures for ALL classes showing these limitations.
>> I have seen you have already started to also define these d
On 17 Nov 2008, at 14:23, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Apple has defined NSInteger/NSUInteger with Mac OS 10.5 and also has
changed the method signatures for ALL classes showing these
limitations.
I have seen you have already started to also define these datatypes
and to slowly use it.
Yes.
I
Am 11.11.2008 um 15:47 schrieb Roland Schwingel:
Hi...
As already announced some days ago I will now start to submit the
patches for GNUstep base/libobjc to be working natively on 64bit
windows.
This first patch submitted (patch #6668) in savannah's patch
manager covers the libobjc run
Hi Richard...
Thanks for your reply!
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote on 24.10.2008 08:04:19:
> > [...]
> First, thanks very much for offering to provide these patches ... I
> think adding windows 64bit support would be great.
>
> The best way to manage patches is to add them to the GNUstep patc
On 22 Oct 2008, at 09:58, Roland Schwingel wrote:
Is there some preference on your side, how we should organize our
patches and the
communication with you, as the changes might cover a wider range of
code ?
First, thanks very much for offering to provide these patches ... I
think adding
Roland Schwingel wrote:
> Hi...
>
> As some might know, we are using GNUstep base intensively on windows.
> We are currently in the phase of porting our code to 64bit. So GNUstep
> base
> must also run in 64 bit on windows. After some studying of the code
> (GNUstep base 1.16.3)
> we already have
