]
To: GNUstep Developers gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: Moving GNUstep applications to GPLv3
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute
On 6/29/07, Yen-Ju Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it is worth to wait and see how other big projects do,
like GCC and GNOME.
And see how it affects some aspects where GNUstep will be used,
like web services (GNUstepWeb) or embedded system (mSTEP).
GCC has been requested (required) to move
explained is the intention.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
- Original Message
From: Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GNUstep Developers gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:23:27 PM
Subject: RE: Moving GNUstep
On 27 Jun 2007, at 09:09, Fred Kiefer wrote:
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
License as published
Hi,
On 2007-06-27 02:23:27 +0200 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best
way
for the project to proceed is to change the license of our
applications
(GWorkspace, Gorm, etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:09:37 +0200, Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General
GNUstep applications to GPLv3
If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for
the
project to proceed is to change the license of our applications (GWorkspace,
Gorm,
etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license. All of the libraries
should
remain LGPL.
You
