Re[2]: [GDL2] NSAutoreleasePool/EOFault

2005-03-13 Thread Manuel Guesdon
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 21:43:15 +0100 David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >| David Ayers wrote: >| >| > David Ayers wrote: >| > >| >> Manuel Guesdon wrote: >| >> >| >>> + (IMP) instanceMethodForSelector: (SEL)aSelector >| >>> { >| >>> if (aSelector == 0) >| >>>[NSException raise:

Re[2]: [GDL2] NSAutoreleasePool/EOFault

2005-03-14 Thread Manuel Guesdon
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:07:14 +0100 David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >| Manuel Guesdon wrote: >| >| > >| > Another idea is to return NULL in (instance)methodForSelector: to tell >the >| > caller should not use imp or cache the method. >| > It should be clean and safe isn't it ? >|

Re[2]: [GDL2] NSAutoreleasePool/EOFault

2005-03-17 Thread Manuel Guesdon
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:56:06 +0100 David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >| Manuel Guesdon wrote: >| >| > >| I agree with Richard, that this is all a bit worry some. But by >design >| > >| those two optimization simply don't work to well together. I think we >| > >| could implement the E