Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-26 Thread Graham J Lee
On 25 Jan 2007, at 22:49, David Ayers wrote: Graham J Lee schrieb: I still haven't been able to duplicate that. Maybe if you're going to FOSDEM we could meet up and have a mini-hackfest to see WTF is happening :-) The issue was not a bug in NSNumberFormatter. It was a bug in the

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-25 Thread Graham J Lee
On 2 Jan 2007, at 09:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Ayers schrieb: Actually I get these failures on the trunk also... So I'll need to investigate... (possibly associated with my locale settings for decimal points?) Indeed this code looks very suspicious: // if no format specified,

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-25 Thread David Ayers
Graham J Lee schrieb: On 2 Jan 2007, at 09:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Ayers schrieb: No...at least, not if it needs to work in the same way as Cocoa's NSNumberFormatter. Because the documentation says this: When you enable localization for a number formatter, separators are

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-02 Thread leeg
David Ayers schrieb: Actually I get these failures on the trunk also... So I'll need to investigate... (possibly associated with my locale settings for decimal points?) Indeed this code looks very suspicious: // if no format specified, use the same default that Cocoa does if (nil ==

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-02 Thread Graham J Lee
On 2 Jan 2007, at 10:16, David Ayers wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: David Ayers schrieb: Currently in a de_AT.UTF-8 locale these tests fail: base/NSNumberFormatter/basic.m: FAIL: default format same as Cocoa pass([str isEqual: @1,234.57], default format same as Cocoa); where str =

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-02 Thread David Ayers
Graham J Lee schrieb: On 2 Jan 2007, at 10:16, David Ayers wrote: I'm not sure if I fully agree here. I would have expected @1.234,57 which of course would have also failed the test. So yes, the test cases need to honor localisation, yet the formatting does not produce the expected

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-01 Thread David Ayers
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library from subversion and check that none of the backported bugfixes is faulty. I would like to make a

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-01 Thread David Ayers
David Ayers schrieb: Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library from subversion and check that none of the backported bugfixes is faulty. I would

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-01 Thread David Ayers
David Ayers schrieb: Actually I get these failures on the trunk also... So I'll need to investigate... (possibly associated with my locale settings for decimal points?) Indeed this code looks very suspicious: // if no format specified, use the same default that Cocoa does if (nil ==

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-01 Thread Matt Rice
On 2007-01-01 14:05:02 -0800 David Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Ayers schrieb: Actually I get these failures on the trunk also... So I'll need to investigate... (possibly associated with my locale settings for decimal points?) Indeed this code looks very suspicious: // if no

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2007-01-01 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
Thanks for testing David. On 1 Jan 2007, at 14:27, David Ayers wrote: FAIL: default format same as Cocoa FAIL: round up for fractional part 0.5 FAIL: round down for fractional part 0.5 FAIL: numeric and space padding OK FAIL: prefix and suffix used properly FAIL: negativeFormat used for -ve

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-30 Thread Paddy Smith
On 12/28/06, Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:38:16 +, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-27 Thread Hubert Chan
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:38:16 +, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library from subversion and check that none of the backported

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-24 Thread Stefan Bidigaray
On 12/23/06, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library from subversion and check that none of the backported bugfixes is faulty. I

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-24 Thread Stefan Bidigaray
I just tried installing from SVN, and using base-1_13_0 like was asked. Needless to say, it doesn't work for the following reason: Compiling file NSAffineTransform.m ... In file included from NSAffineTransform.m:39: ../Headers/AppKit/NSAffineTransform.h:30:40: warning:

Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library from subversion and check that none of the backported bugfixes is faulty. I would like to make a bugfix release early in January... and

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 24 Dec 2006, at 02:27, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: I just tried installing from SVN, and using base-1_13_0 like was asked. Needless to say, it doesn't work for the following reason: Compiling file NSAffineTransform.m ... In file included from NSAffineTransform.m:39:

Re: Test base library stable branch please

2006-12-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 24 Dec 2006, at 01:43, Stefan Bidigaray wrote: On 12/23/06, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could people please make an effort to check out the stable branch (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/gnustep/libs/base/branches/base-1_13_0/) of the base library from subversion and check