Begin forwarded message:
> More GNOME theme improvements...
>
> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com/2010/12/bean-running-with-gnome-native-theme-as.html
This screenshot shows a bug with the text rendering in GNUstep. I'm not sure
exactly what is causing it - it could be in the text rendering code
Am 28.12.2010 21:10, schrieb David Chisnall:
>> More GNOME theme improvements...
>>
>> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com/2010/12/bean-running-with-gnome-native-theme-as.html
>
>
> This screenshot shows a bug with the text rendering in GNUstep. I'm not sure
> exactly what is causing it - it could
Hey Guys,
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> Am 28.12.2010 21:10, schrieb David Chisnall:
>>> More GNOME theme improvements...
>>>
>>> http://heronsperch.blogspot.com/2010/12/bean-running-with-gnome-native-theme-as.html
>>
>>
>> This screenshot shows a bug with the text renderin
Text with GS + cairo looks fine to me - is this not just an artifact from the
screenshot Gregory posted having been downscaled?
On 2011-01-01, at 8:52 AM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>> Am 28.12.2010 21:10, schrieb David Chisnall:
Looks like low quality jpeg compression to me.
my ss has it too but only around the mice
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hgWF81Upeu4/TR-CmdKS-dI/AHA/1ZXc0pCEP2k/s1600/.jpg
..okay, that was just a shameless advertisement injection.
- Original message -
> Hey Guys,
>
> On Sat, Jan
On 1 Jan 2011, at 21:22, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote:
> Looks like low quality jpeg compression to me.
Except that the screenshot is a png...
> my ss has it too but only around the mice
Interestingly, your screenshot doesn't have it around the text. Which back end
are you using?
David
-- Sent
On Jan 1, 2011, at 22:17, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> On 1 Jan 2011, at 21:22, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote:
>>
>> Looks like low quality jpeg compression to me.
>
> Except that the screenshot is a png...
There are severe haloing artefacts around all edges in that picture, not just
text. There's also
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:17 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 1 Jan 2011, at 21:22, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote:
>
>> Looks like low quality jpeg compression to me.
>
> Except that the screenshot is a png...
Right, I actually viewed the header but I guessed it was converted
back from some pipe-line. I be
Never too busy. This is what I thought it was a while back when
David and I first talked since the picture is not full sized. I
deliberately reduced it's size for display on the blog. Blogger.com
gives the option to scale the picture down and I used that. I believe
that the rendering issues
