David Ayers wrote:
Fred Kiefer schrieb:
On the more down to the bits side, I would like to see a stable memory
layout for all GUI classes. This has two aspects, we are still missing
some ivars that will be needed for full OpenStep/Cocoa compliance. The
other side is that we could use more bit
On 30 Oct 2005, at 16:13, David Ayers wrote:
Fred Kiefer schrieb:
On the more down to the bits side, I would like to see a stable
memory
layout for all GUI classes. This has two aspects, we are still
missing
some ivars that will be needed for full OpenStep/Cocoa compliance.
The
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 17:45, Adam Fedor wrote:
What bugs are you talking about? Perhaps we should prioritize the bugs in
the bug database...
Maybye a TODO list ( Roadmap ) before a 1.0 ?
Or maybye put all this TODO list in the bug system with a special
entry/status ?
I checked quickly some
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 20:32, Nicolas Roard wrote:
On 10/26/05, Fabien VALLON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will never release GNUstep if you follow Apple.
Of course, I didn't advocate to hold GNUstep until we're 100%
compatible with current Cocoa.. I was merely pointing that OpenStep
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 19:50, Adam Fedor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Fabien VALLON * Check if all OpenStep methods/classes are
implemented and if not,
implement them or add it in documentation
( ex: in
http://gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/Gui/Gener
On Jeu 27 octobre 2005 18:33, Adrian Robert wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Fabien VALLON wrote:
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 17:45, Adam Fedor wrote:
What bugs are you talking about? Perhaps we should prioritize the
bugs in
the bug database...
Maybye a TODO list ( Roadmap ) before a
In Foundation, NSNumberFormatter still needs work (Fred just recently
started on it), and perhaps we should add the NSMessagePort
implementation on Windows that Richard has talked about to the 1.0
list? I don't know if someone is willing to work on it, but I feel a
fully functional
i'll just pick a random post, and reply to this one...
--- Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2005-10-26 12:13:41 +0100 Dennis Leeuw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. window manager interaction ... I want clicking
on windows to work
*reliably*, so that when I click on
Hi Richard,
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 2005-10-26 08:49:52 +0100 Dennis Leeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is a clear goal. Something we can all agree on, I don't
think there isn't anybody who doesn't want GNUstep to become 1.0. We
just need a list of things to be done and a
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:55:22PM +0200, Fabien VALLON wrote:
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 15:29, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
So, to get back to the 1.0 release idea ...
Highest priority ... fixing bugs that annoy people when they are using the
gui (I'm sure other people use different apps
On 10/26/05, Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Fabien VALLON
For the 1.0 release, what do you think about an
OpenStep-compliant release ?
- This is the first goal of GNUstep.
- There is already some bugs to fix for OpenStep-compliants classes.
-
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 17:45, Adam Fedor wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Fabien VALLON
For the 1.0 release, what do you think about an
OpenStep-compliant release ?
- This is the first goal of GNUstep.
- There is already some bugs to fix for OpenStep-compliants classes.
- There
On Mer 26 octobre 2005 18:00, Nicolas Roard wrote:
On 10/26/05, Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Fabien VALLON
For the 1.0 release, what do you think about an
OpenStep-compliant release ?
- This is the first goal of GNUstep.
- There is already
-Original Message-
From: Fabien VALLON * Check if all OpenStep methods/classes are
implemented and if not,
implement them or add it in documentation
( ex: in
http://gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/Gui/Gener
al/OpenStepCompliance.html
Nothing about NSBTreeBlock and
On 10/26/05, Fabien VALLON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By that I mean that if there are some obscure deprecated methods that
we don't have yet, I'm not sure it's worth implementing them/delay a
1.0 just to claim hey we're _fully_ OpenStep compliant ! -- it's not
like many people care about
15 matches
Mail list logo