Wayland backend status update

2021-12-23 Thread Riccardo Canalicchio
hello, an update on the wayland backend work: there are 2 PRs open that are a cleanup of the existing work and as well they add some functionalities: + https://github.com/gnustep/libs-back/pull/34 the work on the shared memory surface makes the logic more readable, includes a memory leak fix as we

Re: Wayland backend status update

2021-12-23 Thread Riccardo Canalicchio
an idea i've got after sending the email: would it make sense to organise the remaining work with issue tickets in the repository? This way would be easier to discuss the individual topics On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 14:42, Riccardo Canalicchio < riccardo.canalicc...@gmail.com> wrote: > hello, > an up

Wayland backend status update & help appeal

2018-02-20 Thread Ivan Vučica
Hi, A while ago Sergio L. Pascual contributed a 'dirty' wayland backend patch, intended to be used together with cairo. At FOSDEM we worked on merging it, but it didn't worked out. I have not yet merged it as it is not ready for use. You can see current work-in-progress: https://github.com/ivuci

Re: Wayland backend status update & help appeal

2018-02-21 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
> On 20 Feb 2018, at 22:02, Ivan Vučica wrote: > > Hi, > > A while ago Sergio L. Pascual contributed a 'dirty' wayland backend > patch, intended to be used together with cairo. > > At FOSDEM we worked on merging it, but it didn't worked out. I have > not yet merged it as it is not ready for u

Re: Wayland backend status update & help appeal

2018-03-06 Thread Ivan Vučica
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 09:45 Richard Frith-Macdonald < richard.frith-macdon...@theengagehub.com> wrote: > > > > - xdg_shell's get_xdg_surface_special is not referenced elsewhere on > > the interwebs. I have temporarily swapped it for get_xdg_surface; > > thus, no longer is a more detailed window st