On 27 Nov 2009, at 20:05, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>
> Maybe we should file a bug with OS X on that by explaining them that they're
> writing invalid XML 1.0.
I did that some years ago. Possibly they fixed it.
> A fix would be simple for Apple, I think there's nothing to stop them from
Am 27.11.2009 um 20:36 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald:
On 27 Nov 2009, at 18:28, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
Am 27.11.2009 um 09:39 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald:
On 26 Nov 2009, at 17:35, Wolfgang Lux wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
I think directly ~/GNUstep/Defaults/.G
On 27 Nov 2009, at 18:28, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>
> Am 27.11.2009 um 09:39 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald:
>
>>
>> On 26 Nov 2009, at 17:35, Wolfgang Lux wrote:
>>
>>> Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>>>
> I think directly ~/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults ?
> That's XML f
Am 27.11.2009 um 09:39 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald:
On 26 Nov 2009, at 17:35, Wolfgang Lux wrote:
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
I think directly ~/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults ?
That's XML for me now and it wasn't.
Oh, that's a hidden file for private use by the base library ..
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
I think directly ~/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults ?
That's XML for me now and it wasn't.
Oh, that's a hidden file for private use by the base library ...
kind of surprising that anyone would notice, and certainly not
something which should appear in news/r
On 27 Nov 2009, at 08:39, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
The question is, do we want to write illegal XML in property lists?
At the moment the code can write legal XML or illegal (OSX
compatible) XML depending on the OSX compatibility defaults
setting. If we assume that 'XML' property lis
On 26 Nov 2009, at 17:35, Wolfgang Lux wrote:
> Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>
>>> I think directly ~/GNUstep/Defaults/.GNUstepDefaults ?
>>> That's XML for me now and it wasn't.
>>
>> Oh, that's a hidden file for private use by the base library ... kind of
>> surprising that anyone would no
