Hi All!
I am testing Niels' fork of make... and OpenBSD is one of the
candidates, since I have since long issues with gcc there. I hope we can
fix it because I like what Niels is doing there.
Just to make some clarity, let me sum up what is my knowledge:
We have two compilers: gcc and clang
Hi Riccardo,
as far as I understand the options 2 and 3 are no longer supported with a
recent version of David’s runtime. Could we please ignore these two and focus
on the other ones?
It also would help if you could provide us with some more information. Which
version of each relevant componen
Hi
> On 3. Jan 2020, at 01:34, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
>
> I am testing Niels' fork of make... and OpenBSD is one of the candidates,
> since I have since long issues with gcc there. I hope we can fix it because I
> like what Niels is doing there.
>
> Just to make some clarit
> On 3 Jan 2020, at 00:34, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
>
> I am testing Niels' fork of make... and OpenBSD is one of the candidates,
> since I have since long issues with gcc there. I hope we can fix it because I
> like what Niels is doing there.
>
> Just to make some clarity, l
On 3 Jan 2020, at 11:08, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
This gives us the following combinations possible:
1) gcc + own runtime (make detects this config all by itself)
2) gcc + libobjc2 (make configured with gnu-gnu-gnu)
3) clang + libobjc2 and make configured gnu-gnu-gnu
4) clang + libobj
Hi,
On 1/3/20 11:08 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
1) gcc + own runtime (make detects this config all by itself)
2) gcc + libobjc2 (make configured with gnu-gnu-gnu)
3) clang + libobjc2 and make configured gnu-gnu-gnu
4) clang + libobjc2 and make configured ng-gnu-gnu
The introduction o
Hi,
On 2020-01-03 10:07, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
The gnustep packages use option 4, you may look into gnustep.port.mk and the
respective packages makefiles. Libobjc is installed as libobjc2. Linker is
ld.bfd. Libobjc2 is still only 1.8, a few packages had build issues and others
runtime i
