Hi!
It seems like sizeof(void*); is a gcc extension.
Is anyone working on a patch?
This is on 11.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64
Thanks!
David
===> Building for gnustep-base-1.24.8_6
gmake[2]: Entering directory
'/usr/ports/lang/gnustep-base/work/gnustep-base-1.24.8'
This is gnustep-make 2.6.7. Type '
On 17 May 2017, at 17:46, David Wetzel wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> It seems like sizeof(void*); is a gcc extension.
sizeof(void*) is fine, it looks as if this is sizeof({some Objective-C type}),
which has never been permitted in the non-fragile ABI.
David
>
> Is anyone working on a patch?
>
> This
I think your compiler is not complaining about sizeof(void*). Instead this
definition is problematic:
#define GSI_MAP_TABLE_S sizeof(GSI_MAP_TABLE_T)
The error message says why: application of 'sizeof' to interface
'NSConcreteHashTable' is not supported on this architecture and platform
David
How are you building this? The package build cluster has amd64 packages for
gnustep-base, so apparently isn’t hitting this issue (the most recent build was
Saturday).
David
> On 17 May 2017, at 17:46, David Wetzel wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> It seems like sizeof(void*); is a gcc extension.
>
> Is a
Hi!
I guess the FreeBSD ports are *seriously* outdated:
root@sina:/usr/ports/lang/gnustep-base/work/gnustep-base-1.24.8 # more ChangeLog
2015-05-15 Richard Frith-Macdonald
* Documentation/install.texi:
* ANNOUNCE:
* INSTALL:
* NEWS:
Final updates for 1.
On 18 May 2017, at 03:52, David Wetzel wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> I guess the FreeBSD ports are *seriously* outdated:
>
> root@sina:/usr/ports/lang/gnustep-base/work/gnustep-base-1.24.8 # more
> ChangeLog
> 2015-05-15 Richard Frith-Macdonald
>
>* Documentation/install.texi:
>* AN
Hi,
El jue, 18-05-2017 a las 10:13 +0100, David Chisnall escribió:
[...]
> Hmm, I thought we were only one minor revision behind. I’ll look at
> updating them this weekend.
>
> David
>
> P.S. No need to cc portmgr: they’re not the maintainers of the
> GNUstep ports, I am (though I’d be very h
On 20 May 2017, at 06:41, Germán Arias wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> El jue, 18-05-2017 a las 10:13 +0100, David Chisnall escribió:
> [...]
>> Hmm, I thought we were only one minor revision behind. I’ll look at
>> updating them this weekend.
>>
>> David
>>
>> P.S. No need to cc portmgr: they’re not th