Re: libgnustep-base split proposal ... alternative ideas

2006-02-19 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 19 Feb 2006, at 05:27, Andrew Ruder wrote: Hello all, Objective-C is an incredible programming language, but right now the most crippling factor for its widespread use is the lack of a "standard library." Right now there are two prevalent options to utilizing Obj-C in your program: GN

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal ... alternative ideas

2006-02-19 Thread Helge Hess
On 19. Feb 2006, at 10:21 Uhr, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: I don't think libFoundation is more flexible than GNUstep-base ... rather it's different, and I don't really see why gnustep needs to try to 'beat' it. I agree. For me lF is a bit more flexibile since I can change anything I want

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal ... alternative ideas

2006-02-19 Thread Yen-Ju Chen
On 2/19/06, Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 19 Feb 2006, at 05:27, Andrew Ruder wrote: > [snip] > > Possible setups might be ... > > Linux FHS installation (really just needs implementing in gnustep-make) I guess his point is that someone may just want to compile GNUstep-